Thomas Jefferson
‘Missing Links’, what are missing links and how does it affect http://rcm.amazon.com/e/cm?t=theope-20&o=1&p=8&l=bpl&asins=0307444848&fc1=000000&IS2=1<1=_blank&m=amazon&lc1=0000FF&bc1=000000&bg1=FFFFFF&f=ifrEvolutionary thinking? Why do evolutionist’s need to find them in the first place?
There are ‘missing Links’ in our thinking from all sides of the Natural selection problem, but because of Pride and an inability to SEE facts for what they really are, we accept the lie as is.
If we thought the way we do on this on ALL things, the human Race would all be extinct by now. Good Logic and Common Sense are in very short supply when it comes to the VAST evidence of Creation. Boasting and Pride in our own selfish behavior is in Abundance.
Is this true Logic in action?
Is this Honest intellecual behavior?
Archaeoraptor Liaoningensis
This is common with every so-called Missing Link that has been found so far. They are so desperate to find proof that great mistakes are made on a regular basis.
http://rcm.amazon.com/e/cm?t=theope-20&o=1&p=8&l=bpl&asins=B000C4T1L8&fc1=000000&IS2=1<1=_blank&m=amazon&lc1=0000FF&bc1=000000&bg1=FFFFFF&f=ifrDishonest handling of evidence, and ignoring of creationist evidence that better fits the problem is not logical and further creates a divide between real science and Faith.
The Wall Street Journal reports that scientists believe that the almost mythical missing link has been found.
The missing link is supposed to prove that Darwin’s theory of evolution is correct, I mean really they’ve had over 100 years to find just ONE of Millions of Fossils.
Who’s your Momma?
In what could prove to be a landmark discovery, a leading paleontologist said scientists have dug up the 47 million-year-old fossil of an ancient primate whose http://rcm.amazon.com/e/cm?t=theope-20&o=1&p=8&l=bpl&asins=B000ION2HG&fc1=000000&IS2=1<1=_blank&m=amazon&lc1=0000FF&bc1=000000&bg1=FFFFFF&f=ifrfeatures suggest it could be the common ancestor of all later monkeys, apes and humans.
Anthropologists have long believed that humans evolved from ancient ape-like ancestors. Some 50 million years ago, two ape-like groups walked the Earth. One is known as the tarsidae, a precursor of the tarsier, a tiny, large-eyed creature that lives in Asia. Another group is known as the adapidae, a precursor of today’s lemurs in Madagascar.
Based on previously limited fossil evidence, one big debate had been whether the tarsidae or adapidae group gave rise to monkeys, apes and humans. The latest discovery bolsters the less common position that our ancient ape-like ancestor was an adapid, the believed precursor of lemurs. Evolution has CONSTANT CHANGES to coincide with new finds, that is how science works, BUT why make such emphatic statements of certainty about a theory that like the waves of the sea is in constant flux?
In real science your theory should be made more solid with every find, but with evolutionary theory it seems to be made more fluid with every new find and idea added to it! With every new find in science today, Creation Research is solidified as pure Science the more we find out about just how complex our Earth and universe are. This cannot be ignored forever because at some point Creation will stop being theory and become like gravity, ignore it and you’ll fall flat.
This find will be found another fake or misread just as the others, as http://rcm.amazon.com/e/cm?t=theope-20&o=1&p=8&l=bpl&asins=B0010L24UW&fc1=000000&IS2=1<1=_blank&m=amazon&lc1=0000FF&bc1=000000&bg1=FFFFFF&f=ifrtheir record proves only one thing, dishonest dealings in science studies! Creation has a case, A GREAT CASE, but we must be heard before that matters. Those who know the truth are deliberate in their SILENCING of our side of the debate with childish school yard behavior.
They find a Monkey bone, its dated by faulty dating methods and because all Monkeys are necessarily related and by extension because they think man is related to monkeys thereby this monkey is our ancestor, what kind of proof is that, it sounds like ‘Circular Reasoning’ to me!
So why is it that Evolutionist’s cannot call a leap in logic exactly what it is – FAITH….. They are http://rcm.amazon.com/e/cm?t=theope-20&o=1&p=8&l=bpl&asins=B00007KLDW&fc1=000000&IS2=1<1=_blank&m=amazon&lc1=0000FF&bc1=000000&bg1=FFFFFF&f=ifr trying to PLAY connect the dots without really having the complete underlying scientific support for doing so, if they had their ducks in row to start with, these so-called new discoveries of missing links would make perfect sense THEN we could take them seriously. Evolution is FILLED with scandal after scandal, so what makes anything they say true when they have a History of lies and cover-ups to their credit?
See the Piltdown Hoax:CLICK HERE
Low Down on Piltdown
in Creation, this is the trouble Evolutionists face and seem to never be able to answer. We now know that there are in fact tens of thousands of irreducibly complex systems on the cellular level.
