Stop Playing The Progressive Game: Thier Leading You Like Sheep!

What’s your Flight zone?
One of the most basic concepts in handling sheep and other livestock is the flight zone. All animals have a flight zone. A flight zone is an animal’s personal space.
You have a flight zone as a voter, a personal space where you vote from. How you vote is determined by many different things all within your space.You will protect your personal space at any cost and you should.It must be remembered that your personal beliefs can be invaded and it can be made to look like it was your decision.
People are ‘sheep-like’ to progressives and they will use the same ways we heard animals to heard your vote!

What to Do When PROGRESSIVES Invade Your Personal VOTER Space

Boundaries are important when we vote. Setting those boundaries helps us create and sustain healthy voting habits. We must be able to develop Trust and respect for those we vote for and that is built upon developing healthy boundaries emotionally with the candidates.  Progressives love to get us agitated by invading our personal voter spaces with lies mixed with truth, emotional and outright personal attacks against BOTH US and our candidates. This is very effective with the voter block that’s ‘fickle’ and movable from candidate to candidate, as you see today, very few stick with someone when the going gets tough!
Even after knowing its a lie, many voters will overlook the basics about having their personal voter space attacked, and this can lead to BAD DECISIONS concerning the country as a whole. In politics, you’re sure to encounter many situations where political crones ignore the rules and insist on invading your space. Progressives only want one thing, TO WIN and no matter how they can do it they will.These people are ruthless and unfeeling when it comes to your vote, if its not FOR THEM its wasted!

If we do not stop the ‘Progressive lie’ in shared space [The Debate Stage] and they invade your personal space [ The voting Booth] it might be to late ! You as the voter must either defend your ideas with the TRUTH [Which means doing your homework!] against the lie or YOU will allow the country to become victimized by being herded toward their candidate of choice. This is the progressive plan, if the candidate is a danger to their man, then the lies begin to overwhelm the voters.
Progressives like to work on the outside of a voters ‘flight zone’ making the decision to seem like its yours not theirs directly. They create big areas of suspicion and stories that are hard to disprove [But not impossible!] If your ‘flight zone’ is pushed too hard, your behavior can result in unpredictable and dangerous pushes to their agenda. This is what we need to do right now so that their agendas fail.
The Voter’s Point of balance

Point of balance is another important livestock handling concept which can help us to see when they are in our space. When progressives use personal attacks against the Republican or Independent candidates they will stand BACK and toss out lies until one sticks. Remember its not important if the fact is true within a context, it only matters if it sticks long enough to cause damage to their campaign and to their voters viewpoint!

ALL CANDIDATES that are front runners ‘Who are NOT progressives to start with, are personally attacked with lies and people coming out of the woodwork to degrade their appearance to the public! You’ll notice that all the EVIDENCE OF THE HARASSMENT IS NON EXISTENT! WHERE IS THE SUBSTANCE OF THE ACCUSATIONS?
To the progressive party it matters not if their accusations have a base of fact,what MATTERS IS THAT IT DOES WHAT ITS SUPPOSED TO DO….DESTROY THEIR ENEMIES!
“The point of balance is at the animal’s shoulder. All species of livestock will move forward if the handler steps behind the point of balance.” 
Voters will back up if the progressives are standing in front of their point of balance, if they can plainly see the liars lying, the effect is opposite. This is not a place they wish to be and will avoid it at any cost.
Many politicians have made the mistake of standing in front of ‘the point of balance’ of the voter while trying to get voters to move forward to their decision to vote. As with sheep, voters will usually refuse to move one way or the other if they see Democrats or Republicans overstating the case ahead of the vote. Progressives within BOTH parties always attack from behind the Voter hoping they will not turn around to see the liar casting the lie forward! 

Its all about movement down the chute towards the end result, voting in ANOTHER LOSER TO TAKE THE COUNTRY OVER THE CLIFF! Don’t stop to see the real truth, don’t look behind the facts presented AS truth, don’t investigate the facts.

Moving sheep to the slaughter
 Most voters are like sheep and will come when they think they are going to get ‘grain to eat’. Welfare is a strong leading to vote for those who provide it! Its just common sence, It is obvious to anyone that the Progressive party which BEGAN the Welfare state in the first place is using it as a ‘Feed Bucket’ to lead voters who are addicted to welfare!
 It will always be necessary for the progressive party to go out to the ‘field’ to get the voters and either drive them from behind or lead them with lies or with a ‘feed bucket’. Why? Because even their people can be lead away from the cause, this should be encouraging to those who have been victims in the past to know that they don’t always win the day!
Even the progressive ‘Pet sheep’ are difficult to drive and make good lead sheep. If these sheep aren’t familiar with where you want to move them

 [Remember this has never happened before the way its going, the progressives haven’t had this kind of success before its new territory even for them. The economy hasn’t been this bad even during the depression of the 1920’s and 30’s, ITS MORE THAN CRASH TERRITORY HERE ITS WORLDWIDE FREEFALL.]

They needed several people to act as ‘herders’ for this, Obamas Czars are possible examples . As with real ‘sheep herding’ the progressives believe that they should ‘Always move THE VOTERS slowly, calmly, and quietly. Do not allow splinter groups to develop’ within their ranks to reveal thier plans early.

Splinter groups? That’s interesting, is it possible to develop splinter groups within the voter groups that progressives USE to get their way? I think so! You see, people even in a slave state can be shown the truth and reverse a decision and that’s what progressives fear most.

Lies, Double Standards, Error containing some truth, All Out Hypocrisy is always in play when progressives show up! The recent issues coming out about the Occupy movement in Virginia vs. The Tea Party movement. The tea party PAYED FOR THE RIGHT TO BE IN THE SAME PARK that the Occupy protesters GET FOR FREE and their now attempting to get an ‘Excise Tax fee’ from the Tea Party while not charging the Occupy protesters any tax for the SAME thing.



What we do has never been more important in history than now, it is our fault as uninformed voters that this has even been allowed to occur in the first place, we cannot blame anyone but ourselves if freedom is lost forever.

We have willingly become the progressives sheep being herded again and again toward a progressive candidate [Romney, Gingrich] and away from the peoples choices. [Cain, Bauchman, and Ron Paul]

They [the powers that be] cannot allow a candidate to gain in the polls or in popularity with the people if they are not slated to win according to the powers that be in control and are progressive in belief structure.

We have to think like the enemy to be able to defeat them, otherwise they will take our freedom right from under our noses with no remorse whatsoever. Progressives do not care at all who they hurt in the process of destroying anyone, NOT YOU, NOT THE CANDIDATES, NOT THE COUNTRY!

Let’s begin to act like we have brains because if we don’t wake up soon we are going to lose our freedoms in a big way either under A REPUBLICAN PROGRESSIVE LIKE GINGRICH, OR ANOTHER 4 YEARS OF OBAMA.


We must fight for more than our pocket books, our processions and our social status because that’s all SHEEP CARE ABOUT. We must stop believing THE LIES FROM THE LEFT AND THE RIGHT, and concentrate instead on what’s good for our Republic.

We’ve KNOWN since 1963…What Up?

The biggest problem America has is IGNORING HISTORY, not paying attention to warnings and not taking bad people AT THEIR WORD. We need to start doing our homework as individuals and stop expecting the government to do it for us, because as we can plainly see daily they can’t control themselves so what makes us believe they even know history?
America has known about these Communist Goals since 1963
(see The Communist Goals (1963) Congressional Record–Appendix, pp. A34-A35)  these goals have become part of the Democratic Parties Platforms.
Communist agendas and goals that Obama uses on a daily basis to influence, govern, and hoodwink the American people, especially all the minorities, using them to push America toward the cliff of Socialism!
Nature of Conservatism PART 1

#4. Permit free trade between all nations regardless of Communist affiliation and regardless of whether or not items could be used for war.

(trade with Communist China now has America at a disadvantage, we have sold our country out to the CHICOMS by borrowing trillions of dollars and by purchasing their goods help build their military machine -that now is fast become equal to ours.. and our dollars are responsible.

#6. Provide American aid to all nations regardless of Communist domination.

We now give foreign aid to all nations regardless of Communist affiliation our hard earned taxpayer dollars go from congress to Communist countries out the front door and many times out the backdoor.

#7. Grant recognition of Red China. Admission of Red China to the U.N.

We have recognized Red China they are now on the security council of the U.N and our media, our schools have taken the Red out of Red China-now we refer to them as “CHINA” the Democrat/Liberalism in our country has succeeded once again in hoodwinking the American people.

#12. Resist any attempt to outlaw the Communist Party.

The Communist Party and many of it’s offspring are alive an well in the United States to such a extent as to influence the outcome of elections, legislation, and yes the election of a Marxist without vetting into the White House

#13. Do away with all loyalty oaths.

We who are Patriots know what this is all about the Pledge Of Allegiance-we see almost on a daily basis the assault by the ACLU on schools, etc that say the Pledge.

#15. Capture one or both of the political parties in the United States.

The Democrat Party was captured by communist influence and infiltration last century and that influence has grown-we now have a Marxist/Communist in the White House, we have socialist in Congress.

#16. Use technical decisions of the courts to weaken basic American institutions by claiming their activities violate civil rights.

Civil rights, politically correct, hate crimes all tools of the Communist left, all generated by Democrat Party legislation, the courts are full of Communist Democrats (maybe they call themselves Progressives or some other name or tag) but in the end one can recognize the influence of Communism on their court decisions…

#17. Get control of the schools. Use them as transmission belts for socialism and current Communist propaganda. Soften the curriculum. Get control of teachers’ associations. Put the party line in textbooks.

Ladies an Gentlemen this is where the communist party and the Democrats are tied at the hip-they control our public schools, the National Education Association are the controlling body for curriculum taught in our public schools, they influence our youth and like I said all we have to do is look at the OCCUPIERS to recognize the fact that the success of Communist indoctrination in our schools has been a overwhelming success..

#20. Infiltrate the press. Get control of book-review assignments, editorial writing, policy making positions.

Not much needs to be said about this goal, we who care we who have common sense know the mainstream media (PRAVDA WEST) are nothing more than propaganda machines for the Democrat party and the ideology of Communism..

#21. Gain control of key positions in radio, TV, and motion pictures.

Hollywood, television are now completely under the control of Communist, all one has to do is look at the movie industry, their rewriting history, their attitude towards conservatives, they are indeed the hate America crowd…Television is the most corrupting, immoral media on the face of the planet..

#24. Eliminate all laws governing obscenity by calling them “censorship” and a violation of free speech and free press.

The Communist movement in this country has used the 1st amendment for decades to spread their propaganda, their assault on Christians, their assault on our youth, their assault on the American way of life, and the will continue to do so as long as the American people allow this to happen…

#25. Break down cultural standards of morality by promoting pornography and obscenity in books, magazines, motion pictures, radio, and TV.

Look no further than our youth, they have no morals, they have no respect, they have foul mouths using vulgar words regardless who they are around or where they are in public. Pornography is now used in television, the morals of America are well on their way to being completely destroyed by the left.

#26. Present homosexuality, degeneracy and promiscuity as “normal, natural, healthy.”

Undermine our military (Don’t ask Don’t tell) now done away with-homosexuals practice their degenerate lifestyle in public, the media celebrates it, the Democrat Party and the Republican Party support it, the National Education Association promotes it..

#27. Infiltrate the churches and replace revealed religion with “social” religion. Discredit the Bible and emphasize the need for intellectual maturity which does not need a “religious crutch.”

Obama said Some Americans use their bible as a crutch, he goes after Christians every chance he gets, he never prays, never in public speeches refer to God or our Christian faith, he has discredited the Bible.  The Democrats have made huge inroads in the complete destruction of morals and the Christian religion, the one thing that still stands in their way of complete take over of America…

#28. Eliminate prayer or any phase of religious expression in the schools on the ground that it violates the principle of “separation of church and state.”

One of the main goals of the ACLU-DEMOCRATS SECULARIST-COMMUNIST and they are succeeding, they have used the courts of America against Christians, against prayer, while promoting their religion of materialism,secularism,communism…and pushed God out of our schools.

#29. Discredit the American Constitution by calling it inadequate, old-fashioned, out of step with modern needs, a hindrance to cooperation between nations on a worldwide basis.

I ask you how many times have you heard students, professors, the president,congress members say the Constitution is inadequate-old-fashion out of step with modern needs-must be changed?

Again, our school system has succeeded in completely brainwashing our youth to believe the constitution was written by a bunch of white haired,racist guys, I have heard that response many times..

#30. Discredit the American Founding Fathers. Present them as selfish aristocrats who had no concern for the “common man.”

See response to goal number #29

#31. Belittle all forms of American culture and discourage the teaching of American history on the ground that it was only a minor part of the “big picture.” Give more emphasis to Russian history since the Communists took over.

Political correctness fits nicely into this goal 

(PC was generated by the left) to use as a tool to achieve success for Goal #31

#32. Support any socialist movement to give centralized control over any part of the culture–education, social agencies, welfare programs, mental health clinics, etc.

Many minorities in our country and a segment of mainstream population have accepted the welfare system as a way of life (they are socialist) socialism has infiltrated our schools, churches,government welfare programs generated by the Democrats for one reason only CONTROL of the POPULATION  that is what Communism is based on, and the Democrat party has bought into it.

#36. Infiltrate and gain control of more unions.

Unions in America are completely controlled by socialist,communist,progressives, they have become a money generating machine for the re-election of Democrats, UNIONS TODAY stand for socialism…

#40. Discredit the family as an institution. Encourage promiscuity and easy divorce.

We who care we who are family oriented,we who bust our buns to support our families and try as best we can to raise our children as Americans,with a moral upbringing, we know that divorce is a family killer, it undermines the very institution of marriage and family that has been the glue to hold this country together…

#42. Create the impression that violence and insurrection are legitimate aspects of the American tradition; that students and special-interest groups should rise up and use [“]united force[“] to solve economic, political or social problems. 

1. Anti War movement (Vietnam) 

2.  The Occupiers, just two examples of the success goal number 42 has achieved..By giving a false view of the original American Revolution.
(They like to leave out the MANY years of talking and negotiation we had with England, before THEY started the war against us!)


By Frances Rice
Contemptible aptly describes the race mongering by Democrats for partisan political gain.  No issue, from Obama-Care to Voter ID, escapes being demagogue by Democrats with false accusations of racism leveled at Republicans who disagree with Democrats on policy.  
With not an ounce of shame, Democratic National Committee Chairwoman Debbie Wasserman Schultz went on the African-American network TV One’s program “Washington Watch” and accused Republicans of wanting to return America to Jim Crow segregation laws, merely because they are seeking to require photo identification to register to vote.   
It takes Weiner-level hubris for Democrats to conjure up the specter of Jim Crow against Republicans since Democrats enacted those discriminatory laws.   The roots of modern-day racism rest squarely in the Democratic Party.  As author Michael Scheuer wrote, the Democratic Party is the party of the four S’s:  slavery, secession, segregation and now socialism.
  Details about the true history of civil rights can be found in the book “Whites, Blacks and Racist Democrats” by Wayne Perryman.  An excellent summary of the issue of civil rights is contained in Chapter 10 of Ann Coulter’s new book “Demonic”, an excerpt of which is posted on the Human Events website and shown below.
Frances Rice is a lawyer, a retired Army lieutenant colonel and chairman of the National Black Republican Association.  She may be contacted on the Internet at: 
Civil Rights and the Mob: George Wallace, Bull Connor, Orval Faubus And Other Democrats
by Ann Coulter
June 7, 2011
An excerpt from Ann Coulter’s new book, Demonic: How The Liberal Mob Is Endangering America.    
It was the Democratic Party that ginned up the racist mob against blacks and it is the Democratic Party ginning every new mob today— ironically, all portraying themselves as the equivalent of the Freedom Riders.
With real civil rights secure—try to find a restaurant that won’t serve a black person—modern civil rights laws benefit only the mob, not the victims of the mob, as American blacks had been. Just as fire seeks oxygen, Democrats seek power, which is why they will always be found championing the mob whether the mob consists of Democrats lynching blacks or Democrats slandering the critics of ObamaCare as racists.
Democrats have gone from demagoguing white (trash) voters with claims that Republicans are the party of blacks, to demagoguing black voters telling them Republicans are the party of racists. Any mob in a storm.
The liberal fairy tale that Southern bigots simply switched parties, from Democrat to Republican, is exactly wrong. What happened is: The Democrats switched mobs. Democrats will champion any group of hooligans in order to attain power. 
As Michael Barone said of the vicious segregationist (and Democrat) George Wallace, he was “a man who really didn’t believe in anything—a political opportunist who used opposition to integration to try and get himself ahead.”
This is why the Democrats are able to transition so seamlessly from defending Bull Connor racists to defending Black Panthers, hippies, yippies, Weathermen, feminists, Bush derangement syndrome liberals,, and every other indignant, angry mob.
Every segregationist who ever served in the Senate was a Democrat and remained a Democrat except one. Even Strom Thurmond—the only one who later became a Republican—remained a Democrat for eighteen years after running for president as a Dixiecrat. There’s a reason they were not called the “Dixiecans.”
A curious sleight of hand is required to hide from the children the fact that all the segregationists in the Senate were Democrats. In history books, such as Robert A. Caro’s biography of Lyndon Johnson, the segregationists are not called “Democrats.” They’re called “Southerners.”3
Except it wasn’t just “Southerners” voting against civil rights. Not every senator who opposed black civil rights was a Southerner, but every one was a Democrat. 
In addition to the Southern Democrats who voted against putting the 1957 civil rights bill on the Senate calendar, for example, there were five Democrats from nowhere near the South: Democratic senator Wayne Morse of Oregon—a favorite target of Senator Joe McCarthy—Democratic senator Warren Magnuson of Washington, Democratic senator James Murray of Montana, Democratic senator Mike Mansfield of Montana, and Democratic senator Joseph O’Mahoney of Wyoming.4
According to Caro, the Western Democrats traded their votes on civil rights for a dam authorization on the Idaho-Oregon border.  That’s how dear black civil rights were to liberals—they traded them away for a dam.
While Democrats are the party of the mob, Republicans are the party of calm order, willing to breach the peace only when it comes to great transgressions against humanity—slavery, abortion, and terrorism.
After the Civil War, it was Republicans who passed the Thirteenth Amendment, granting slaves their freedom; the Fourteenth Amendment, granting them citizenship; and Fifteenth Amendment, giving them the right to vote. It was Republicans who sent federal troops to the Democratic South to enforce the hard-won rights of the freed slaves.
Then, as now, the Democrats favored the hooligans. The Ku Klux Klan was originally formed as a terrorist group to attack Republicans who had come to the Democratic South after the Civil War to help enforce legal equality for freed slaves.
It was—again—Republicans who passed the Civil Rights Act of 1866 and the Reconstruction Act of 1867, both signed into law by Re- publican president Ulysses S. Grant. Under the “living Constitution,” the Supreme Court upheld fraudulent “separate but equal” accommodations for blacks in the 1896 case Plessy v. Ferguson.
Republicans kept introducing federal civil rights bills and Democrats kept blocking them—a bill to protect black voters in the South in 1890; anti lynching bills in 1922, 1935, and 1938; and anti–poll tax bills in 1942, 1944, and 1946.
With a lock on the racist mob vote, Democratic politicians won elections and promptly re-segregated the entire South with Jim Crow laws. In 1913, Progressive Democrat president Woodrow Wilson even instituted segregation in Washington, D.C., bringing Jim Crow to the federal workforce. Wilson summarily dismissed black officials from their federal jobs in the South and in D.C.  
A friend of Wilson said that with him running the country, “Negroes should expect to be treated as a servile race.”7 There’s your post- racial Democratic Party.
A crucial part of the Democrats’ victim folklore is that they have been losing the South to Republicans over the past half century because the Democrats stood on principle to oppose race discrimination, while the Republican Party pandered to racists in the South—a region of the country liberals believe is composed primarily of Klan members. 
(That might be your first clue as to why Southerners don’t like liberals.)
The Republican Party’s allegedly racist appeal to Southerners is darkly referred to seventeen times a day in the mainstream media as the “Southern Strategy.”
In fact, it was Eisenhower who broke the Democrats’ hold on the South in 1952, and if anyone was appealing to bigots that year, it wasn’t Eisenhower. Democrat Adlai Stevenson, known to experience “personal discomfort in the presence of Negroes,”12 chose as his running mate John Sparkman of Alabama, a Democrat segregationist.
And yet the Old South—which according to mainstream media accounts voted Republican solely out of racial resentment—suddenly started voting Republican in 1952. Ike carried Tennessee, Virginia, and Florida outright, and nearly stole Kentucky, North Carolina, and West Virginia from Stevenson.
(Eisenhower lost Kentucky by a microscopic .07 percent and lost West Virginia and South Carolina by fewer than 4 percentage points.)
This was just four years after Democrat-turned-Dixiecrat Strom Thurmond won four Southern states. But running with a segregationist didn’t help Stevenson in the South a few years later.
Then, in 1956, the Republican Party platform endorsed the Supreme Court’s 1954 decision in Brown v. Board of Education that desegregated public schools; the Democratic platform did not, and would not, as long as Democrats were winning elections by appealing to the racist mob. This led the black congressman Adam Clayton Powell Jr. to break with his party and endorse Eisenhower for president.
Governor Orval Faubus, progressive New Deal Democrat, blocked the schoolhouse door to the Little Rock Central High School with the state’s National Guard rather than allow nine black students to attend. 
In response, President Eisenhower federalized the Arkansas National Guard to take it out of Faubus’s hands. Then he sent the 101st Air- borne Division to walk the black children to school and stay with them throughout the day.
Eisenhower implemented the 1948 executive order President Truman had issued—but then ignored—desegregating the military. Also unlike Truman, Eisenhower hired blacks for prominent positions in his administration.
It was Republicans who overwhelmingly introduced, promoted, and passed every civil rights act from the end of the Civil War right up to and including the 1964 Civil Rights Act. President Eisenhower pushed the Civil Rights Act of 1957, written by Attorney General Herbert Brownell, guaranteeing black voting rights, to be enforced by the U.S. Department of Justice.
During the endless deliberation on Eisenhower’s civil rights bill, Senator Lyndon Johnson warned his fellow segregationist Democrats, “Be ready to take up the goddamned nigra bill again.”
Senator Sam Ervin, another liberal luminary—instrumental in the destruction of anti-communist Republicans Joe McCarthy and Richard Nixon—told his fellow segregationists, “I’m on your side, not theirs,” and advised them to face up to the fact that “we’ve got to give the goddamned niggers something.”14
Until 1964, every civil rights act had presented no possible constitutional problems—those federal laws were fully within Congress’s enumerated powers to enact because they were directed at government officials (Democrats) who were violating the Constitution by denying black citizens the right to vote.
Federal laws aimed at discrimination by government actors are expressly within Congress’s authority under the Fourteenth Amendment.
The Democrats opposed these civil rights laws not because of any questions about Congress’s authority to enact them—they couldn’t care less about the Constitution—but because they wanted to keep discriminating.
The 1964 Civil Rights Act was again supported overwhelmingly by Republicans and less so by Democrats. As with the 1957 and 1960 civil rights acts, it was Republicans who passed the 1964 Civil Rights Act by huge majorities, with a distinctly smaller majority of Democrats sup- porting it. 
In the Senate, for example, 82 percent of Republicans voted for the 1964 Civil Rights Act, compared with only 66 percent of Democrats. In the House, 80 percent of Republicans supported the ’64 bill, compared with only 63 percent of Democrats.
The only reason Democratic majorities were beginning to support civil rights for blacks was that by 1964—thanks to Republican voting rights acts—more blacks were voting. Democrats couldn’t keep winning elections in some parts of the country by appealing to the racist mob.
As Democratic senator Carter Glass of Virginia had explained years earlier, “Discrimination! Why that is exactly what we propose,” saying the Democrats sought to “remove every negro voter who can be gotten rid of, legally, without materially impairing the numerical strength of the white electorate.”  The Democrats’ position on civil rights depended on where the votes were.
Once the Democrats got involved, civil rights became just another racket with another mob. Unlike previous civil rights laws, the 1964 Civil Rights Act included provisions aimed at purely private actors, raising the hackles of some constitutional purists, notably Barry Goldwater, the Republicans’ 1964 presidential nominee. 
Goldwater, like the rest of his party, had supported every single civil rights bill until the 1964 act. But he broke with the vast majority of his fellow Republicans to oppose the 1964 Civil Rights Act.
Like many other conservatives opposed to a living, growing, breathing Constitution, Goldwater actually opposed only two of the seven major provisions of the bill—those regulating privately owned housing and public accommodations. 
But there were other provisions he would have made tougher. For example, Goldwater wanted to make it mandatory that federal funds be withheld from programs practicing discrimination, rather than discretionary, as President Kennedy had requested.
Goldwater was a vehement foe of segregation. He was a founder of the NAACP in Arizona, donating the equivalent of several thousand dollars to the organization’s efforts to integrate the public schools. 
When he was head of the Arizona National Guard, he had integrated the state Guard before Harry Truman announced he was integrating the U.S. military. As the Washington Post said, Goldwater “ended racial segregation in his family department stores, and he was instrumental in ending it in Phoenix schools and restaurants and in the Arizona National Guard.”
But he was also a believer in limited government. It was, after all, racist Democratic politicians in the South using the force of the government to violate private property rights by enforcing the Jim Crow laws in the first place. As Sowell points out, it wasn’t the private bus companies demanding that blacks sit in the back of the bus, it was the government.
Goldwater not only had personally promoted desegregation, he be-longed to a party that had been fighting for civil rights for the previous century against Democratic obstructionism. Lyndon Johnson voted against every civil rights bill during his tenure in the Senate. But by the time he became president, he had flipped 180 degrees. Appealing to regional mobs wouldn’t work with a national electorate.
Unlike mob-appeasing Democrats, Goldwater based his objections to certain parts of the 1964 Civil Rights Act on purely constitutional principles. Along with other constitutional purists in the Republican Party, Goldwater opposed federal initiatives in a lot of areas, not just those involving race. 
By contrast, segregationist Democrats routinely criticized the exercise of federal power and expenditure of federal funds when it involved ending discrimination against blacks—but gladly accepted federal pork projects for their states.
It would be as if, after fighting the Democrats for a hundred years over the issue of abortion, Republicans finally got Roe v. Wade over- turned, and then, out of pure political calculation, Democrats jumped on the bandwagon and demanded a federal law outlawing abortion. 
Some pro-life Republicans would probably object that federal law outlawing abortion is not one of Congress’s enumerated powers.
On the basis of Republicans’ constitutional objections, Democrats would then reverse the entire history of the pro-life movement and start claiming the Democratic Party alone fought to end abortion in America. That is exactly what they have done with the history of civil rights.
Ann Coulter is Legal Affairs Correspondent for HUMAN EVENTS and author of High Crimes and Misdemeanors, Slander, Treason, How to Talk to a Liberal (If You Must), Godless, If Democrats Had Any Brains, They’d Be Republicans, Guilty: Liberal “Victims” and their Assault on America, and the forthcoming Demonic: How The Liberal Mob Is Endangering America.

The Truth about WHY the Indians were treated the way they were and BY WHOM!


Celebrating Thanksgiving in America

December 1621 to thank God and to celebrate with their Indian friends 11 – America’s first Thanksgiving Festival. Ninety Wampanoag Indians joined the fifty ……/CelebratingThanksgivingInAmerica.pdf

Issues and Articles – God: Missing in Action from American History?

John Marrant, the first African American to evangelize successfully among American Indians; the Rev. Richard Allen, who gained his freedom from slavery, …

Much of our history is filled with opportunism WITHOUT self control or God’s leading being a part of that exploration, this is NOT God’s fault but ours as a nation. So it is important to understand that many historical settings were plainly UNCONSTITUTIONAL in nature AND UNGODLY in their viewpoint, the USEFUL IDIOTS of the time being used by the powers that be. 
When we look at the circumstances surrounding certain happenings in history its very important that we UNLIKE those who have a personal agenda, like the useful idiots, use our heads to get to the bottom of the WHY of history.

The American Indian was FAR FROM INNOCENT and very far from being God fearing people, while some of their practices can be traced to biblical practices they were after all “Pagan institutions” developed over Centuries of practice! The further away from their biblical roots the more polluted with “Pagan ideas” their lives became.
 The useful idiots love to develop story lines of Christian vs Indian practice and surrounding that with Land grabbing and murder, because that sells press not the MANY STORIES of Christian and Indian cooperation. The MANY years of peace mean little to the idiots that serve bad press.

It must be understood that as long as God’s Love and Laws were obeyed within the confines of history there was peace and understanding and when those rules were broken for ANY REASON – war and death followed and NO NATION ON EARTH WAS OR IS EXEMPT.
History must be tempered with PROPER background, and that background must be tempered with PROPER facts tempered by THE TRUTH OF GOD. Those who USE History as their “personal agenda creator” are the worst kind of people. 

They look at issues in history like “Slavery or Indian affairs” and superimpose upon them a “Modern mindset of agendas” that did not exist then, this is changing history IN ANOTHER TIME PERIOD to serve an agenda NOW IN THIS TIME. Not to avoid repeating the issue, which would be a Nobel idea but to make the modern issue seem worse than it really is.

Ask yourself the question, have “Indian Affairs” been helped by these useful idiots or has it been rendered as more of the same. They’ve created a certain view of history and then mirrored that same FALSE idea throughout our history to make America seem less of what she really is.
The problem is, its FALSE HISTORY that is the basis of every idea that we now use to deal with the Indians, the Blacks, the Hispanics and others including Whites. All peoples have been badly represented by these “idiots” who use history to bring down nations and governments for their Socialist, Communistic agendas. The Muslims have rearranged history in their favor many times and are doing as we speak.

Is President Obama Correct: Is America No Longer a Christian Nation?

Apr 10, 2009 … repeatedly claimed that America is not a Christian nation. He ….. in which Indian lands were wrongly being taken for timber, minerals, and other ……/IsPresidentObamaCorrectIsAmericaNoLongeraChristianNation.pdf

How Congress Took Control of Indians’ Lives” 
by Rob Natels
Just as Congress has stretched its Interstate Commerce Power into authority over the entire national economy, so it has used the Indian Commerce Clause to justify micro-managing the lives of American Indians and of their tribes.
It wasn’t supposed to be that way.
The Articles of Confederation gave Congress power over Indian “affairs,” but in practice the states also continued to exercise authority over Indians. States passed trade laws, regulated Indian land transactions, and in some cases exercised a general police power over Indians within their boundaries.
When the Constitution was adopted, the federal government was granted some control over dealings with the Natives. However, this was one of the very few areas where the Constitution actually granted the new governmentless authority than Congress had enjoyed under the Confederation.
Instead of sweeping power over Indian “affairs,” the Constitution granted 
(1) to the President-and-Senate, power to make treatise with the Natives, 
(2) to Congress, power over federal property and territories (where many tribes lived), and 
(3) also to Congress, the power to “regulate Commerce . . . with the Indian tribes.”
The Treaty Clause (II-2-2) empowered the President-and-Senate to govern the details of Indian relations, but only with the consent of the affected tribes, since both sides must agree to a treaty.
The Territories and Property Clause (IV-3-2) granted Congress power to regulate tribes, but only on federal land. The Indian Commerce Clause (I-8-3) gave Congress control over mercantile trade and certain related activities.
The specific model in the Indian area consisted of state Indian trade statutes and a Confederation ordinance that addressed such matters as preventing fraud, licensing merchants, and regulating prices.
Also part of the constitutional settlement was that the states retained their general police power over Indians within their borders, subject to pre-emption by congressional regulations of commerce and by treaties.
This system began to break down in the 1870s with the announcement by Congress that the federal government would no longer make treaties with the Indians. How Congress could bind the President-and-Senate this way was never adequately justified or explained.
Congress then began to regulate Indian affairs on the basis that doing so was part of its “inherent sovereign authority”—supposedly unenumerated authority outside the Constitution.
The theory of “inherent sovereign authority” is complete jurisprudential nonsense, and contradicted by both the intent and words of the Tenth Amendment. Although the Supreme Court rejected the theory in Kansas v. Colorado (1907), it continues to surface from time to time.
Also cited as justifying wide congressional authority was the “trust relationship” between the federal government and the Indians. But trust rules do not grant power; they merely set standards by which power is to be executed.
In modern times, the favorite justification for congressional omnipotence over the tribes is the Indian Commerce Clause. Apologists resort to some of the same tricks used to justify congressional omnipotence over the economy—including the Indian Trade and Intercourse Act of 1790, which I discussed in my last post.
In the area of Indian commerce, moreover, apologists for Congress often go even farther, claiming that congressional authority over Indian affairs is exclusive—that states have no jurisdiction over Indians at all. There is little justification for this theory, and it has proved unworkable in practice.

In 2007, I researched and wrote an article called The Original Understanding of the Indian Commerce Clause.
During the research, I found that the state of the commentary on the Indian Commerce Clause was even more dismal than in most other areas of constitutional law. Most of articles on the constitutional background consist of interventions by activists and others with little knowledge of the Founding Era or of originalist methodology.
Bottom line: Reading the Constitution according to its real meaning shows that, although Congress was to have a significant say in Indian affairs, its rightful power is far from absolute. Both Indians and non-Indians need to inform Congress of this much more often.
In private life, Rob Natelson is a long-time conservative/free market activist, but professionally he is a constitutional scholar whose meticulous studies of the Constitution’s original meaning have been published or cited by many top law journals. 
(See Most recently, he co-authored The Origins of the Necessary and Proper Clause (Cambridge University Press) and The Original Constitution(Tenth Amendment Center). 
After a quarter of a century as Professor of Law at the University of Montana, he recently retired to work full time at Colorado’s Independence Institute.