The following information was gathered on Facebook from a former Muslim who chillingly warns America about the Muslim threat and unlike Ron Paul’s head in the sand approach to dealing with Islam I think its very important that we take the threat seriously. 
Diane M. George

I was born and raised as a Muslim. My whole family is still Muslim. I know every genetic code of Muslim. I know Islamic brain. I live and breath with them. I am an insider. I left Islam when I understood that Islam is a sick and evil religion. 

The following is the Islamic message to the West.

To the infidels of the West:

The Constitution for the new Islamic Republics of Euro Arabia and Amer-Islamism are under construction.

We will fight the infidel to death.

– Meanwhile American laws will protect us.

– Democrats and Leftist will support us.

– N.G.O.s will legitimize us.

– C.A.I.R. will incubate us.

– The A.C.L.U. will empower us.

– Western Universities will educate us.

– Mosques will shelter us

– O.P.E.C. will finance us

– Hollywood will love us.

– The leadership of the UN and most of the United Nations will cover our asses.

Our children will immigrate from Pakistan, Egypt, Saudi Arabia, Iran, and Indonesia and even from India to the US and to the other Western countries. 

They will go to the West for education in full scholarship. America is paying and will continue to pay for our children’s educations and their upbringing in state funded Islamic schools.

We will use your welfare system. Our children will also send money home while they are preparing for Jihad.

We will take the advantage of American kindness, gullibility, and compassion. When time comes, we will stab them in the back. We will say one thing on the camera and teach another thing to our children at home. We will give subliminal messages to our children to uphold Islam at any cost. Our children in America will always care more about Islamic Country’s interest than US interest.

We will teach our children Islamic supremacy from the very childhood. We will teach them not to compromise with Infidel. Once we do that from the very early age our children won’t hesitate to be martyr. We will take over the Europe first and then US will be the next. We already have a solid ground in the UK, Holland, Sweden, Spain, Italy, Germany, and now in the US.

Our children will marry Caucasian in Europe and in America. We will mixed with intricate fabric of the Western society but still will remember to Jihad when time comes. Who are we?

We are the “sleeper cells”.

We will raise our children to be loyal to Islam and Mohammad only. Everything else is secondary.

At the time of the real fight we will hold our own children as our armor. When American or Israeli troops shoot at us the world will be watching. Imagine,… Imagine the news in the world “Death of Muslim babies by infidels”.


We know CNN, ABC, CBS are broadcasting live. Al-Jazeera will pour gasoline on the fire. The news will spread like wildfire. “Americans killed 6 babies, 10 babies”. “Jews killed two women”,

Keep your Nukes in your curio cabinets. Keep your aircraft carrier or high-tech weaponry in the showcase. You can’t use them against us because of your own higher moral standard. We will take the advantage of your higher moral standard and use it against you. We won’t hesitate to use our children as suicide bomber against you.

Visualize the news flash all over the world, …Muslem mother is sobbing, …crying. …her babies are killed by Jews and Americans, the whole world is watching live. Hundreds of millions of Muslims all around the world are boiling. They will march through Europe. We will use our women to produce more babies who will in turn be used as armor/shield. Our babies are the gift from Allah for Jihad.

The West manufactures their tanks in the factory. We will manufacture our military force by natural means, by producing more babies. That is the way it is cheaper.

You infidels at this site cannot defeat us. We are 1.2 billion. We will double again. Do you have enough bullets to kill us?

On the camera:

– We will always say, “Islam is the religion of Peace.”

– We will say, “Jihad is actually inner Jihad.”

– Moderate Muslims will say there is no link between Islam and Terrorism and the West will believe it because the West is so gullible.

– Moderate Muslims all over the world will incubate Jihadists by their talk by defending Islam.

– Using Western Legal system we will assert our Sharia Laws, slowly but surely.

– We will increase in number. We will double again.

You will be impressed when you meet a moderate Muslim personally. As your next-door neighbor, coworker, student, teacher, engineer, professionals you may even like us. 

You will find us well mannered, polite, humble that will make you say, “wow, Muslims are good and peaceful people”, But, we will stab you in your back when you are sleeping as we did on 911.

There will be more 911 in Europe and in America. We will say, “We do not support terrorism but America got what it deserved.”

Muslims, CAIR, ISNA, MPAC and other international Islamic Organizations will unite. We will partner with Leftist, ACLU, with the UN, and if we have to then, even with France. Fasten your seat-belt. The war of civilizations has just begun.

We will recite Quran and say Allah-Hu-Akbar before beheading infidels, as we have been doing it. We will video tape those and send it to all infidels to watch. They will surrender – ISLAM means surrender.

We will use your own values of kindness against you.

You are destined to loose.

An example of progressive Cowardice: This is why you vote these idiots out!

Joint House/Senate Homeland Security Committee Hearing on Radical Islam’s Terror Threat to U.S. Military Communities


Wednesday Rep. Peter King (R-N.Y.) and Sen. Joseph Lieberman (I-Conn.) opened a hearing to examine the emerging threat to the military from homegrown terrorists within the U.S. and named the armed services as the “most sought-after” target for radical Islamist extremist groups.
Rep. Dan Lungren (R.-Calif.) asked Paul Stockton, assistant defense secretary for homeland defense, whether “we are at war with violent Islamist extremism.”
Listen to this COWARD try to side step the obvious question of “Are we at war with RADICAL ISLAMIC TERRORISM” Why in the world can he not answer YES? I’ll tell you why, this administration is friendly with them in a way that makes me and should make you sick! This reason alone is reason enough to get these mad-men out of their respective offices.

To accompany the hearing, Chairman King released a Congressional Majority Investigative Report, also entitled,

“Homegrown Terrorism:
The Threat to Military Communities inside the United States.”
 The report offers numerous details on the dangers faced by our military and their families on U.S. soil, noting,

“The Department of Defense considers the U.S. Homeland the most dangerous place for a G.I. outside of foreign warzones – and the top threat they face here is from violent Islamist extremists.

 While our troops at overseas bases train their weapons outward to prevent armed enemies from getting “inside the wire,” one way militant Islamists are penetrating our defenses is through enlistment in the U.S. Armed Forces.
A significant and growing number of military personnel, such as alleged Fort Hood mass murderer Army Maj. Nidal Malik Hasan, pose a serious danger to their brothers and sisters in arms who wear the same uniform.”

 It would seem to me that in Washington DC, cowardice is the operative word. It would be high time this time around that we as Americans would finally see that these kind of people do not deserve our vote, THEY ARE TRADERS TO THE AMERICAN DREAM.
Don’t get me wrong there are a FEW in Washington that care to change the problems, but how can they, when WE the American people keep voting in losers who stay with the ‘status-quot’ and make their job harder?
Do we vote in these people out of a duty of fairness, so both sides get a chance? That in view of the facts is a very dumb proposition indeed.
Giving BOTH parties a chance at the change we want is a total waste of time since BOTH parties have the same end result, HOW CAN EITHER SIDE BRING CHANGE that the American people want if our viewpoints are are vastly different from each other?
The progressive change that Obama brought was NOTHING like the change he promoted during his election run at least not like what we thought it was!
The people we know care can’t do their jobs if we don’t care on our end, and our end of this is even more important than we have given it credit.

Our vote has been demeaned and downcast by the Left and the Right for so long EXCEPT WHEN THAT VOTE COUNTS FOR THEM! They cheat, steal and misinform our Vote until we don’t know the people we are voting for or at least what they really stand for.
It is this very ‘toxic asset’ called the Vote that progressives wish to control, they have controlled the minority vote for decades, not because minorities are stupid, far from it, they have simply controlled HOW WE SEE, FEEL, AND PERCEIVE THE FACTS! 

That is what must stop, and remember BOTH parties have been doing the same thing. We need to change this NOT by complaining about THINGS we don’t have, but by changing the paradigm completely by which we view ALL POLITICIANS BY! Vote out EVERY progressive no matter what in 2012 and beyond and then we can get back our country.

Progressives are a political Cancer designed to dismantle and destroy the constitutional ground work of America – NOT OVERNIGHT BUT OVER TIME and they’ve been doing it since 1910. So you do the math and look at where we’re at now, if you cannot see that voting in more of the same kind of dangerous people is playing ‘Russian Roulet’ then welcome to communist America!


 Voting based upon stupid decisions like: I LIKE THE NAME, THE FAMILY, THE NATIONALITY OF THE CANDIDATES!

I always vote for a women, a man!

I ALWAYS vote for candidates because its what my family has always had a duty to do – Vote party line!

This is absurd, who cares about those things? If progressives have infiltrated ALL OF THAT, and exist in every level of American society then voting along these impersonal lines makes no sense whatsoever. It is because of our lack of understanding the progressive agendas in the first place. We allow them to steal our votes, because we are to lazy to dig out their motives!

What matters to AMERICA is not the outward appearance of the candidates, not their family life, not their nationalities but their voting records over the time they have served, what they have stood for and behind and nothing else. 

All that other stuff is a slight of hand and nothing to base your vote on!

What we should be focusing on is CONTENT instead of empty talk. Substance beyond the debates, that’s where the rubber meats the road not how well they attack each other. Neither Romney nor Gingrich have told the truth about their voting records which is public record for all to see, and they depend on the fact MOST Americans will not check on it.

Romney Vs. Perry on the Issues!

Romney Voting Record:

 Gingrich Voting Record:

 Michele Bachmann

Jon Huntsman

Ron Paul

Rick Santorum



Obama’s Record-

Joe Biden

We as Americans must redefine why we vote if our vote is to count for anything at all. Progressives ARE THE PROBLEM, how they define freedom is unconstitutional and against basic American values. Their intent is to manipulate the system that our founders established, to redefine words we take for granted like FREEDOM, RIGHTS AND GOVERNMENT. 

While a third party WILL NOT SOLVE OUR PROBLEMS it is important to know that the Tea Party SHOULD begin to do as our enemy has done, INFILTRATE our government from the bottom up in every segment AND FILL IT WITH CONSTITUTIONAL LOVING PEOPLE.

In the above debate about Terrorism and Islam, we see this constant bogus statement thrown out to us that Islam is a peaceful religion and some have HIJACKED their faith to excuse hateful terrorist aims, but the facts, ALL THE FACTS on the ground say plainly that Islam is a murderous, hate filled Ideology and not a true religion. It contains elements of religious thought but is only an Ideology of hate in the end!

The Koran cannot be read without plainly seeing the hate contained within it unlike when the Bible states the facts as they were not as God intended them to be, sure there are verses which can be taken on their own as hate but when nested within their plain context are plainly not hate at all. The Koran on the other hand is nested on its intent as whole chapters filled with hate, racism and murder.
Do your homework America, there’s no escaping the facts:

The State Department website makes it sound so innocent.

“The United States has invited foreign government officials with responsibilities comparable to those at the Departments of Justice and Homeland Security to discuss best practices for two of the recommended actions from resolution 16/18:

engagement with members of minority religious communities and enforcement of laws that prohibit acts of discrimination on the basis of religion or belief.”

Let me translate.

The US has asked the secret police from the most repressive Islamic countries in the world for advice on how to quash anti-Islamic speech here.

What are the agenda items going to include? Flat vs. Sharp – The best kinds of rocks to use when stoning Christians?


Questionnaire for Muslims seeking U.S. Citizenship….Hummmmm!

It never ceases to amaze me just how DUMB Americans can be, we need; just as sheep do, to be prodded into the right direction to go, we must be lead constantly away from improper justification of stupid beliefs. Our beliefs about Islam’s true threat to the American way of life is a blatant example of that dumbness that seems never to go away!
Islam is the single most dangerous religion on the planet, just as dangerous as the Catholic Church was in the middle ages to the true underground believers. Only Islam hate every fiber of American society, so why in the world do we still fall for the same crap they spue out week after week?
The following DOES NOT EXIST as a questionnaire presently, but it should be a requirement to enter the U.S. immigration system for any and all Muslims! This EXPOSES the real Muslim agenda for America and would end the legal infiltration of our country!
 “The Messenger and those who believe with him, strive hard and fight with their wealth and lives in Allah’s Cause.”
 “Fight and kill the disbelievers wherever you find them, take them captive, harass them, lie in wait and ambush them using every stratagem of war.”
 “The Believers fight in Allah’s Cause, they slay and are slain, kill and are killed.”
“Fight those who do not believe until they all surrender, paying the protective tax in submission.”
 “Muslims, fight in Allah’s Cause. Stand firm and you will prosper. Help the Prophet, obey him, give him your allegiance, and your religion will be victorious.”
 “Fight them until all opposition ends and all submit to Allah.”
Qur’an:8:39 “So fight them until there is no more Fitnah (disbelief [non-Muslims]) and all submit to the religion of Allah alone (in the whole world).”
 “He said, ‘Fight them so that there is no more rebellion, and religion, all of it, is for Allah only. Allah must have no rivals.'”
“Fight them and Allah will punish them by your hands, lay them low, and cover them with shame. He will help you over them.”
 “I am fighting in Allah’s service. This is piety and a good deed. In Allah’s war I do not fear as others should. For this fighting is righteous, true, and good.”
 “Our onslaught will not be a weak faltering affair. We shall fight as long as we live. We will fight until you turn to Islam, humbly seeking refuge. We will fight not caring whom we meet. We will fight whether we destroy ancient holdings or newly gotten gains. We have mutilated every opponent. We have driven them violently before us at the command of Allah and Islam. We will fight until our religion is established. And we will plunder them, for they must suffer disgrace.”
 “O Prophet, urge the faithful to fight. If there are twenty among you with determination they will vanquish two hundred; if there are a hundred then they will slaughter a thousand unbelievers, for the infidels are a people devoid of understanding.”
 “Prophet exhort the believers to fight. If there are twenty good fighters they will defeat two hundred for they are a senseless people. They do not fight with good intentions nor for truth.”
 “A man whose face was covered with an iron mask came to the Prophet and said, ‘Allah’s Apostle! Shall I fight or embrace Islam first?’ The Prophet said, ‘Embrace Islam first and then fight.’ So he embraced Islam, and was martyred. Allah’s Apostle said, ‘A Little work, but a great reward.'”
 “Our Prophet, the Messenger of our Lord, ordered us to fight you till you worship Allah alone or pay us the Jizyah tribute tax in submission. Our Prophet has informed us that our Lord says: ‘Whoever amongst us is killed as a martyr shall go to Paradise to lead such a luxurious life as he has never seen, and whoever survives shall become your master.'”
(1) The Constitution of the United States requires equal legal rights for men and women. This means that the testimony of one woman counts exactly the same as that for one man in a court of law. There are no possible exceptions to this rule for any American citizen.
Qur’an 2:282 says, in part:
  “call in to witness from among your men two witnesses; but if there are not two men, then one man and two women from among those whom you choose to be witnesses…”
This is the basis for Shariah law which holds that in all cases of law the testimony of two women is necessary to equal that of one man.
Do you repudiate the principle in the Qur’an which requires that it takes the testimony of two women to equal the testimony of one man in a law court?
(2) US Law does not tolerate wife beating and regards it as a crime.
Qur’an 4:34 says:
” Men are the maintainers of women because Allah has made some of them to excel others and because they spend out of their property; the good women are therefore obedient, guarding the unseen as Allah has guarded. But as to those women on whose part you fear desertion, admonish them, and leave them alone in the sleeping-places and beat them; then if they obey you, do not seek a way against them; surely Allah is High, Great “
Do you repudiate the teaching in the Qur’an which approves wife beating?

(3) Cruel and unusual punishment is illegal by provisions of the US Constitution. This includes such retribution as physical mutilation and injury to the body.
Qur’an 5:38
“As for the thief, both male and female, cut off their hands. It is the reward of their own deeds, an exemplary punishment from Allah. Allah is Mighty, Wise.”
Qur’an 5:33
“The punishment of those who wage war against Allah and His Messenger, and strive with might and main for mischief through the land is: execution, or crucifixion, or the cutting off of hands and feet from opposite sides, or exile from the land: “
Do you repudiate all verses in the Qur’an which demand cruel and unusual punishment?

(4) The age of marriage varies by state, but in all cases requires that a wife should be of child bearing age, that is, she should be post-pubescent, generally 15 or 16 years of age minimum, 17 or 18 in other jurisdictions.
Qur’an 65:4
“As for your women who have despaired of further menstruating, if you are in doubt, then their waiting period is three months as well as those who have not yet menstruated. As for those who are pregnant, their term shall be the time they deliver their burden. Allah will ease (matters) by His order for whosoever fears Him.”
As a Muslim scholar named Maududi has said in his official interpretation of this verse:
 “Therefore, making mention of the waiting-period for girls who have not yet menstruated, clearly proves that it is not only permissible to give away the girl at this age but it is permissible for the husband to consummate marriage with her. Now, obviously no Muslim has the right to forbid a thing which the Qur’an has held as permissible.”
Do you repudiate this verse in the Qur’an which regards child marriage as approved, which American law regards as a form of child molestation?

(5) The 13th Amendment to the US Constitution explicitly outlaws slavery in all forms, male or female.
Qur’an 4:92
” And it does not behoove a believer to kill a believer except by mistake, and whoever kills a believer by mistake, he should free a believing slave, and blood-money should be paid, but he who cannot find a slave should fast for two months successively.”
As scholars have pointed out, this verse assumes that Muslims will own slaves, or a significant number will, as did Muhammad, who owned slaves and bought and sold them.
This is just one verse out of dozens that approve the institution of slavery and present in as an eternal condition of humanity.
Do you repudiate all verses in the Qur’an which approve slavery?
(6) Hate speech is objectionable in American culture, and federal law regards such language as legally actionable, deserving punishment. While there are various categories of hate speech, general agreement is that anti-Semitism is the worst such offense.
Qur’an 5:60-65 says in part, speaking specifically of Jews as verse 59 makes clear:
 “Those whom God has cursed and with whom He has been angry, he has transformed them into apes and pigs, and those who serve the devil”
This is the source of Muslim demonstrators’ signs and chants that Jews are apes and pigs –the Qur’an itself.
There are still other passages in Muhammad’s book which also are anti-Semitic –as the term is generally used in America to refer to anti-Jewish bigotry.
Do you repudiate all anti-Semitic hate speech in the Qur’an, especially verse 60 of Surah 5?
(7) War or any acts of physical violence, or threat of violence, with the intention of forcing people to convert to a religion is utterly abhorrent to American law and is explicitly outlawed by the First Amendment.
 “Thy Lord inspired the angels (with the message):
 “I am with you: give firmness to the Muslims, I will instill terror into the hearts of the unbelievers. Smite them on their necks and cut all their fingers off.”
This is one of 164 jihad verses in Muhammad’s book. Of this number approximately 100 are commandments to able-bodied Muslim men to physically fight against non-Muslims. 
The remaining 64 verses deal with inner struggle, etc, and are not the subject here.
Generations of Muslim authorities leave zero room to doubt that war or other forms of physical violence on behalf of Islam, with the objective being forced conversion of non-Muslims, is commanded and is not an option.
 In most cases the “cover” –rationalization– for such aggression is the pretext that these should be defensive campaigns. Except that, from the outset, while Muhammad was still alive and a leader in jihad, few if any jihads were defensive at all and were only claimed to be, because Muslims were offended that other people would not willingly surrender to their armies when invaded. 
That is, there is no reasonable doubt that the meaning of the 100 jihad verses in question all promote violence against people of other faiths. The main objective is conversion but also important is terrorizing others so that they fear the wrath of Muslims.
Do you repudiate all jihad verses in the Qur’an which command Muslims to fight against non-Muslims with the objective of converting other people to Islam? YES / NO
(8) The First Amendment guarantees freedom of religion to all US citizens. No-one may prohibit someone from changing religion, or ceasing to belong to a religion.
No-one may prohibit someone, in any appropriate setting, from seeking to convince someone else of the rightness of his or her faith and seeking to win converts. No believers of any faith are exempt from this provision of the First Amendment.
Qur’an 4:88-89
“Then what is the matter with you that you are divided into two parties about the hypocrites? Allah has cast them back (to disbelief)… Do you want to guide him whom Allah has made go astray? … They wish that you reject (Islam), and thus that you all become equal (like any other faith). So, take not… (friends) from them, till they emigrate in the way of Allah (to Muhammad). But if they turn away (from Islam), take hold of them and kill them wherever you find them .”
 One of several verses which deal with what Muslims characterize as apostasy. The penalty for what Americans insist is a God-given right, to free choice in religion, is death in an Islamic context.
Do you repudiate all apostasy verses in the Qur’an and uphold the principle of free choice in religion?
(9) In America, free speech is sacrosanct and, while a people have the right to object to criticisms of their beliefs, and while others must obey libel or slander laws, everyone who so desires is free to make any criticisms of religion he or she wishes to make.
This is considered a moral good when one’s motivation is making the truth widely known. It does not matter if a truth is popular or unpopular; honesty is the higher virtue by far, indeed, there is no real contest.
Qur’an 4:140
“Allah will collect the hypocrites and those who defy faith – and put them in Hell.”
This is one verse which is foundational to Shariah law penalizing all forms of what Muslims characterize as “blasphemy.” Depending on the “offense” and what country such law is enforced in, the punishment may be anything from jail time or banishment, to death.
What qualifies as blasphemy ?
A few examples: criticizing Islam making jokes about Muhammad or the Qur’an, criticizing the Qur’an, which is regarded by Muslims as Allah’s exact words incarnate on Earth asserting that the Qur’an was written by Muhammad rather than a transcription of Allah’s words, for example, calling the Qur’an “Muhammad’s book.” criticizing Muhammad, especially perceived insults of Muhammad criticizing such Muslim practices as saying prayers 5 times a day, prostrate on the floor reporting objective facts that embarrass Muslims, such as the fact that Muhammad married Aisha, a girl of 6 and consummated the “marriage” when she was 9. creating an image of Muhammad or portraying him with an actor in a movie or stage play claiming to be a prophet.
The last item makes all Mormons guilty of blasphemy since all male Mormons are considered prophets by their church and all Mormon women accept this belief.
One or more items make Christian missionaries who express honest opinions about the Qur’an or Muhammad guilty of the “crime” of blasphemy who, in some countries, with Pakistan being especially notorious, are killed. Indeed, considering these types of “blasphemy” alone, each, by American law, is a form of protected speech to which all US citizens are entitled.
Do you repudiate all anti-blasphemy laws in Shariah, those derived directly from the Quran as well as those derived from Hadith traditions?

(10) The First Amendment guarantees freedom to worship any deity of your choice. Or freedom to be an Agnostic or Atheist. You may worship 100 Gods or Goddesses, or just one, or none at all. All US citizens accept this principle but are free to express their opinions if they think someone Else’s beliefs are wrong.
Qur’an 4:116
“Verily Allah does not forgive setting up partners in worship with Him. But He forgives whom he pleases, sins other than that.”
To be devoted to a Goddess, in other words, is, in Islam, the unforgivable sin. Also extremely serious is
Qur’an 2:28,
 “How do you disbelieve in Allah, seeing that you were dead and he gave you life! Then he will cause you to die…”
In other words, Goddess worship deserves death according to Islam, and Atheists also deserve death.
In some Muslim lands capital punishment for these “offenses” are de jure carried out.
Almost all Hindus are devotees of one or more Goddesses, so are most Mahayana Buddhists in Japan and elsewhere. Taoists venerate a Goddess, as do Zoroastrians (Anahita) and traditional Pagans such as those in the Baltic states and rural Russia.
So do Wiccans and most other neo-Pagans. Islam considers Catholics and the Greek Orthodox as Goddess worshippers for their devotion to Mary, and the Mormons worship the Heavenly Mother as well as the Heavenly Father.
 Plus there are normative Christian groups, like Assyrian Christians, who adhere formally to usual Church doctrine but who informally venerate the Goddess Ishtar.
Altogether, about 2 billion people in the world can be classified as Goddess devotees, closer to 3 billion if you add Catholics and the Orthodox. A reasonable estimate is that, including Mormons, about 15 or 20 million Americans are Goddess devotees of one kind or another.
And all deserve the full protection of American law as guaranteed by the First Amendment.
Do you repudiate all passages in the Qur’an that demand death or other extreme punishment for Atheists and Goddess devotees?
There are numerous other morally reprehensible passages in the Qur’an, all of which contravene American law and the freedoms guaranteed in the Constitution.
These ten examples are sufficient to make the criminality of Islam crystal clear, however, and to argue the point that Islam in any orthodox form should be criminalized in the United States. In other words, Islam should be outlawed in much the same way as Communism and Nazism were outlawed in the mid 20th century.
There might be exceptions for some Sufi schools or some Ahmadiyya groups, to speak of people who have already rejected objectionable parts of the Qur’an, and it is not surprising to learn that many of these smaller groups are themselves persecuted and rejected by mainstream Islam.[2]
As for MINOs, Muslims In Name Only, there is no real objection, but otherwise Islam should be recognized for what it is, a subversive and criminal religion that functions in outright defiance of American law and which is based on principles which are totally incompatible with the US Constitution.
Islam, to discuss people who actually believe in the Qur’an, promotes physical violence against non-Muslims, it seeks to intimidate others through threats of violence, it promotes hate speech, and generally can be thought of as an organized mental illness.
As we all know, from daily news stories in the press and TV, this is a matter of actions that kill people, that threaten citizens of many countries that simply wish to live in peace, and that incite outrages against “unbelievers” through hate speech.
To be very sure, Muslims may deny each and every fact about their travesty of a religion presented here. About which there are two basic rejoinders,
Anyone familiar with the fact that the Qur’an is really two books in one, the Mecca Surahs and the Medina Surahs, can tell you, if he or she is honest, that most of the “good” teachings in the Qur’an date to Muhammad’s years in Mecca, when he preached tolerance and a form of morality which resembled that of Judaism or Christianity.
However, in the Medina years, partly by use of the doctrine of abrogation, which nullified earlier verses at will, of which well over a hundred Mecca verses were repudiated as obsolete, what resulted was a religion that some scholars compare with Bolshevism and others consider to be an early form of Nazism.
 Personally the comparison with Nazism seems most accurate given the fact that the Grand Mufti of Jerusalem spent the WWII years in the Third Reich and organized regiments of Bosnian Muslims to fight in the ranks of the SS, and considering the fact that the Muslim Brotherhood, the “parent” of Al Qaeda and still other terrorist groups, was funded by the Nazis and was their political inspiration.
There is a “slight detail” called the doctrine of taqiyya lying in order to further the interests of Islam. At least two Qur’an verses are fairly explicit about this, Qur’an 3:28 and Qur’an 16:106, and this doctrine is not limited to the Shi’ite sect.
The gist of things is that Muslims are free to tell others falsehoods about Islam if they think it will protect Muslims or their property, are free to misrepresent Islam, are free to camouflage their actual purposes behind a cloak of good works, etc.
 In other words, Muslims simply cannot be trusted to tell the truth about their religion.
But the truth is there to be seen, and anyone who so desires can study the Qur’an and read its collection of criminal precepts any time it is convenient to do so. Not my problem if someone simply can’t be bothered to do so, or prefers cock-and-bull stories manufactured by simpletons like Karen Armstrong and purveyed by charlatans like George W Bush or Barack Hussein Obama.
Islam is a criminal religion and it really doesn’t matter if someone who is famous lies about this painful reality. As a criminal religion it has no legitimate place in the United States of America.
About the Questionnaire:
No-one who answers even one question with a “NO” should be eligible for US citizenship. For a Muslim to become a citizen, all questions should require a “YES” answer.
Clearly this presents a dilemma for any believing Muslim. He or she cannot deny the perceived “truth” of even one verse in the Qur’an since all verses, according to the Qur’an’s own words, are the presumed actual words of Allah, and are inviolate and holy.
For a Muslim to give even one “YES” answer is to commit apostasy via blasphemy in belief and condemn himself –or herself– to death.
This is the exact intent of the Questionnaire, to show everyone exactly how unethical and criminal the core text of Islam actually is, how evil the religion of Islam actually is, and how antithetical to most or close to all values which Americans regard as absolutely essential –or even divinely sanctioned.
Billy Rojas[3]
Eugene / Oregon

  1. Qur’an verses may not have the identical Surah (chapter) number in different translations of Muhammad’s book. There is no standard numbering system. However, all translations include the same verses, and if a passage is not found in one place it exists elsewhere in the text.

Surahs are always numbered exactly the same. Different translations will make use of somewhat different word choice in the English language, but the meaning is always the same or very close to exactly the same.

    3. Originally written by Billy Rojas; former teacher of Comparative Religion, history and social science. Alice Lloyd College, Phoenix College, Lower Columbia College, City Colleges of Chicago assigned to the US Navy PACE Program to provide college course instruction to military personnel on board the aircraft carrier, USS Enterprise . Also a lecturer at the University of Oregon, Pacifica Forum, 2008 – early 2010.

    I agree 100% with this and applaud this man for putting this truth out, let’s see if this is brought out on TLC’S new show ‘American Muslim’s’? Not likely since that is a propaganda arm of THE FEDERAL GOVERNMENT.

    Is the Constitution compliant?
    Sharia for Dummies
    Imam Feisal Abdel Rauf claims that the US constitution is Sharia compliant. Now let us examine below a few laws of Sharia to see if Imam Rauf is truthful or a fraud:
    1- Jihad defined as “to war against non-Muslims to establish the religion” is the duty of every Muslim and Muslim head of state (Caliph). Muslim Caliphs who refuse jihad are in violation of Sharia and unfit to rule.
    2- A Caliph can hold office through seizure of power meaning through force.
    3- A Caliph is exempt from being charged with serious crimes such as murder, adultery, robbery, theft, drinking and in some cases of rape.
    4- A percentage of Zakat (alms) must go towards jihad.
    5- It is obligatory to obey the commands of the Caliph, even if he is unjust.
    6- A caliph must be a Muslim, a non-slave and a male.
    7- The Muslim public must remove the Caliph in one case, if he rejects Islam.
    8- A Muslim who leaves Islam must be killed immediately.
    9- A Muslim will be forgiven for murder of :
     1) an apostasy 2) an adulterer 3) a highway robber.
    Making vigilante street justice and honor killing acceptable.
    10- A Muslim will not get the death penalty if he kills a non-Muslim.
    11- Sharia never abolished slavery and sexual slavery and highly regulates it. A master will not be punished for killing his slave.
    12- Sharia dictates death by stoning, beheading, amputation of limbs, flogging and other forms of cruel and unusual punishments even for crimes of sin such as adultery.
    13- Non-Muslims are not equal to Muslims and must comply to Sharia if they are to remain safe. They are forbidden to marry Muslim women, publicly display wine or pork, recite their scriptures or openly celebrate their religious holidays or funerals.
     They are forbidden from building new churches or building them higher than mosques. They may not enter a mosque without permission. A non-Muslim is no longer protected if he commits adultery with a Muslim woman or if he leads a Muslim away from Islam.
    14- It is a crime for a non-Muslim to sell weapons to someone who will use them against Muslims. Non-Muslims cannot curse a Muslim, say anything derogatory about Allah, the Prophet, or Islam, or expose the weak points of Muslims. However, the opposite is not true for Muslims.
    15- A non-Muslim cannot inherit from a Muslim.
    16- Banks must be Sharia compliant and interest is not allowed.
    17- No testimony in court is acceptable from people of low-level jobs, such as street sweepers or a bathhouse attendant. Women in such low level jobs such as professional funeral mourners cannot keep custody of their children in case of divorce.
    18- A non-Muslim cannot rule even over a non-Muslims minority.
    19- Homosexuality is punishable by death.
    20- There is no age limit for marriage of girls under Sharia. The marriage contract can take place anytime after birth and consummated at age 8 or 9.
    21- Rebelliousness on the part of the wife nullifies the husband’s obligation to support her, gives him permission to beat her and keep her from leaving the home.
    22- Divorce is only in the hands of the husband and is as easy as saying: “I divorce you” and becomes effective even if the husband did not intend it.
    23- There is no community property between husband and wife and the husband’s property does not automatically go to the wife after his death.
    24- A woman inherits half what a man inherits.
    25- A man has the right to have up to 4 wives and she has no right to divorce him even if he is polygamous.
    26- The dowry is given in exchange for the woman’s sexual organs.
    27- A man is allowed to have sex with slave women and women captured in battle, and if the enslaved woman is married her marriage is annulled.
    28- The testimony of a woman in court is half the value of a man.
    29- A woman looses custody if she remarries.
    30- To prove rape, a woman must have 4 male witnesses.
    31- A rapist may only be required to pay the bride-money (dowry) without marrying the rape victim.
    32- A Muslim woman must cover every inch of her body which is considered “Awrah,” a sexual organ. Some schools of Sharia allow the face and some don’t.
    33- A Muslim man is forgiven if he kills his wife caught in the act of adultery. However, the opposite is not true for women since he “could be married to the woman he was caught with.”
    The above are clear cut laws in Islam decided by great Imams after years of examination and interpretation of the Quran, Hadith and Mohammed’s life. Now let the learned Imam Rauf tell us what part of the above is compliant with the US constitution?

    Moro Islamic Liberation Front- Islam at its worst!

    No matter the excuse made for peace there is no excuse for accepting terrorists into your reality, you cannot EVER TRUST a terrorist who has as his backing a RELIGION SUCH AS ISLAM. Islam’s tenets are TERROR, MURDER, RAPE, PILLAGING AND ALL FORMS THAT BREAK THE TEN COMMANDMENTS.
    Islam has NOTHING in common with Christian forms of governing, let alone moral laws in Christian countries. Their moral center is founded upon IMMORAL standards of civilized living! Hatred of Women, Capitalism, Child Rape, stoning of those who simply disagree. 


    The Moro Islamic Liberation Front (MILF) (Arabic: جبهة تحرير مورو الإسلامية) is an Islamist group located in the southern Philippines.[2] It is one of two Islamic militant groups, the other being the Abu Sayyaf, that are fighting against Government of the Philippines
    These groups are most active in the Bangsamoro region of Mindanao, the Sulu Archipelago, Palawan, Basilan and other neighbouring islands.[3]
     The Moro Islamic Liberation Front was formed in 1978 when Hashim Salamat, supported by ethnic Maguindanaos from Mindanao, split from the Moro National Liberation Front (MNLF), a rebel organization formed in the 1960s following the Jabidah massacre. The MILF established the formation of an independent Islamic state in the southern Philippines and took part in terrorist[4][5] attacks and assassinations to achieve their goals. The government in Manila did not recognize this demand and sent troops into the southern Philippines to control the insurgency.

    The MILF was established in 1981 when Salamat Hashim and his followers split from the MNLF, due to the MNLF’s reluctance to launch an insurgency against the Philippine government and its supporters.[6]

    The MILF received support from Muammar Gaddafi, who was also involved with other groups in the Philippines.[7][8][9]

    In January 1987, the MNLF accepted the Philippine government’s offer of semi-autonomy of the regions in dispute, subsequently leading to the establishment of the Autonomous Region of Muslim Mindanao. The MILF, however, refused to accept this offer and continued their insurgency operations. 

    A general cessation of hostilities between the government in Manila and the MILF was signed in July 1997 but this agreement was abolished in 2000 by the Philippine Army under the administration of Philippine President Joseph Estrada. In response, the MILF declared a jihad (strived and struggled) against the government, its citizens and supporters. Under President Gloria Arroyo, the government entered into a cease-fire agreement with the MILF and resumed peace talks.[10]

    Despite peace negotiations and the cease-fire agreement, the MILF attacked government troops in Maguindanao resulting in at least twenty-three deaths in January 2005. The combined armies of the MILF and Abu Sayyaf were involved in days of fighting which necessitated government troops using heavy artillery to engage rebel forces.

    The bombing incident in Davao airport in 2003 which the Philippine government blamed on MILF members,[11] raised speculation that the peace negotiations might be ineffectual in bringing peace to Mindanao if the MILF is unable to control its operatives. The MILF denies ties with terrorist group Jemaah Islamiyah, although Jemaah Islamiyah is considered to have provided them with training facilities in areas they control.[12][13] The MILF also continues to deny connections with Al-Qaeda, though it has admitted to sending around 600 volunteers to Al-Qaeda training camps in Afghanistan and that Osama Bin Laden sent money to the Philippines, though the group denies directly receiving any payment.[14]

    From June 28 to July 6, 2006, conflict between the MILF and armed civilian volunteers under Maguindanao Province governor Andal Ampatuan who were supported by the Philippine Army had been reported. The fighting began after governor Ampatuan blamed the MILF for a June 23 bomb attack on his motorcade, which killed five in his entourage. The MILF denied responsibility, but Ampatuan sent police and civilian volunteers to arrest MILF members connected to the attack. Four thousand families were reported displaced by the fighting that followed, which was ended by a cease-fire agreement signed on July 10 and July 11.[15]


     Basilan beheading incident


    In March 2007, the Philippine government offered to recognize the right of self-determination for the Moro people which it had never done in three decades of conflict.[16] 

    However on July 12, 2007, Islamic militants in Basilan in the southern Philippines killed 14 marines, beheading 11 of them, while 9 other marines were wounded and about 4 rebels were killed. The fighting took place as the marines were searching for kidnapped Italian priest, Giancarlo Bossi on June 10, 2007. A MILF soldier confirmed that some of its members had been involved in gun battles, despite the MILF peace treaty with the Philippine government. Mohagher Iqbal, the chief negotiator for the MILF, denied that it was responsible for the beheadings and the priest’s abduction.[17]

    On July 19, 2007, despite no ransom being paid, Giancarlo Bossi, who was kidnapped on June 10 in Zamboanga Sibugay province, was freed. Philippine authorities described his kidnappers as members of the Abu Sayyaf. Government authorities blamed a renegade commander of the MILF for Bossi’s kidnapping, but it denied any involvement.[18][19]

    According to the provincial administrator of Basilan, more than 900 families have been displaced as a result of the deployment of soldiers in Basilan in response to the beheading of 11 soldiers of the Philippine Marines who were killed in an encounter with MILF in Al-Barkah town.[20] While the MILF owned their responsibility over the death of the 14 soldiers of the Philippine Marines. They describe this as a warning for trespassing in their territory in Basilan. In previous agreements, the two groups have negotiated about respecting MILF camps and presence to avoid conflicts in these areas, an agreement that is prone to violation.[20][20]

    On August 4, 2008, the Supreme Court of the Philippines issued a temporary restraining order, preventing the Government and the MILF from officially signing the Memorandum of Agreement on Ancestral Domain, which would conclude all dispute and begin formal talks that would lead to the drafting and eventual signing of a Final Comprehensive Compact between the two groups.[21] 

    The Court accepted motions by the southern provincial governments that object to the extended boundaries for the Autonomous Region in Muslim Mindanao envisioned in the peace deal. The MOA-AD would have allowed the Moro people gained control of the region under the concept of human rights with the right to establish a police force and to control natural resources.[22]

    The MOA-AD was initialed by former governor and peace panel chair Rodolfo García and Presidential Adviser on the Peace Process Hermogenes Esperon and MILF peace panel chair Mohagher Iqbal on July 27 in Malaysia. It was scheduled for formal signing on August 5, but the Supreme Court issued no negotiation preventing the executive department from signing the agreement.[23] 

    The MOA-AD is the last of several agenda items under the 2001 agreement of the GRP-MILF. after security and relief and rehabilitation, prior to the discussion on the political settlement.[23]
    The Young Moro Professionals Network (YMPN) appealed to the public not to be afraid of the MOA-AD and to “open your hearts to the Moro grievance.”[24] The YMPN said in a statement dated August 21:

    “In these times of hardship, we hold hands as one, with our Christian and Islamic neighbours, in the name of peace, acceptance and justice. We are committed to a democratic and peaceful resolution of the conflict. Do not be afraid of the MOA-AD. To the national public, open your hearts to the Moro grievance.[24]

    Over the next month, several MILF commanders were tagged by government officials as having initiated an offensive campaign. This was responded by the Armed Forces of the Philippines, which immediately deployed ten battalions composed of a total of 6,000 soldiers into Mindanao under the command of Lt. Gen. Cardozo Luna.[25] 

    The violence displaced over 600,000 people and left about 300 dead.[26]

    On October 14, 2008, the Court, conducted a series of divided votes declared “contrary to law and the Constitution” the MOA-AD of the Government of the Republic of the Philippines and Moro Islamic Liberation Front Tripoli Agreement of Peace on 2001. The document of Conchita Carpio-Morales ruled:

    “In sum, the Presidential Adviser on the Peace Process committed grave abuse of discretion when he failed to carry out the pertinent consultation process. The furtive process by which the MOA-AD was designed and crafted runs contrary to and in excess of the legal authority and amounts to a whimsical, capricious, oppressive, arbitrary and despotic exercise thereof. It illustrates a gross evasion of positive duty and a virtual refusal to perform the duty enjoined.”[27][28][29]

    Civil society organizations such as Consortium of Bangsamoro Civil Society had submitted a Motion for Reconsideration. However, the Supreme Court affirmed its October 14 ruling that declared unconstitutional the initialed MOA-AD between the Philippine government and the Moro Islamic Liberation Front on November 21, 2008.[23]

    MILF soldiers offered to help free the Irish priest father Michael Sinott, who was kidnapped in the Philippines on October 14, 2009 and sought permission to deploy about 100 of its soldiers in the area where Sinnott is believed to be held. However it was turned down by the Philippine government.

    On September 23, 2010, Mohagher Iqbal said that the MILF will pursue for a substate likened to a U.S. State instead of independence from the Philippines. The Muslim substate will not exercise power over national defense, foreign affairs, currency and coinage, and postal services, which the central government exercises. Igbal further added that the substate will not have its own armed forces but instead will have troops for internal security.[1]


    1. ^ a b Philippine Muslim rebels drop independence demand, ABC News International.
    2. ^ By Orlando de Guzman (2003-05-06). “Online Article:The Philippines’ MILF rebels, Last accessed 23 October 2006”. BBC News. Retrieved 2010-06-04.
    3. ^ Philippines CIA World Factbook, 2006
    4. ^ “Retrieved April 2, 2009 (12.20 GMT)”. Cdi.org. 2002-02-15. Retrieved 2010-06-04.
    5. ^ John Pike. “Retrieved April 2, 2009 (12.21 GMT)”. Globalsecurity.org. Retrieved 2010-06-04.
    6. ^ Dangerous dynamics: activists, militants and terrorists in Southeast Asia, Wright-Neville, D. The Pacific Review 17 (1), (2004)
    7. ^ Geoffrey Leslie Simons. Libya: the struggle for survival. p. 281.
    8. ^ “A Rogue Returns – Libya quietly makes a comeback”. AIJAC. February 2003.
    9. ^ Qaddafi, terrorism, and the origins of the U.S. attack on Libya (1990). Brian Lee Davis
    10. ^ “In the Spotlight: Moro Islamic Liberation Front”. Terrorism – Terrorist Network. Archived from the original on 2008-07-09.
    11. ^ President: MILF has until June 1 to cut terror links, Guinto, J. Philippine – Daily Inquirer, 13 May (2003)
    12. ^ “MIPT Terrorism Knowledge Base”. Tkb.org. Archived from the original on 2007-12-27. Retrieved 2010-06-04.
    13. ^ “Terrorism – Terrorist Network – In the Spotlight: Moro Islamic Liberation Front”. Cdi.org. 2002-02-15. Retrieved 2010-06-04.
    14. ^ Tentacles of terror: Al Qaeda’s Southeast Asian network, Abuza, Z. Contemporary Southeast Asia 24(3),(2002)
    15. ^ Buffer zones set up to prevent CVO-MILF clashes in Maguindanao , Carolyn Arguillas, Mindanews.com, July 10, 2006
    16. ^ “Breakthrough seen in Manila’s talks with Muslim rebels”. Reuters. March 10, 2007. Retrieved March 10, 2007.
    17. ^ “Online Article: Rebels behead Philippine troops, Last accessed 12 July 2007”. BBC News. 2007-07-11. Retrieved 2010-06-04.
    18. ^ Eux.tv, Abducted Italian priest freed in southern Philippines Last accessed 20 July 2007[dead link]
    19. ^ Maitem, Jeoffrey (20 July 2007). “MILF to Military on Bossi: ‘We told you so'”. Newsinfo Inquirer. Retrieved 10 June 2011.
    20. ^ a b c Lidasan, A. (2007) The Moro people have had it with all-out wars! Make Room for Peace, Pull-out troops in Basilan. Arkibong Bayan
    21. ^ “jurist.law.pitt.edu, Philippines high court blocks signing of regional peace agreement”. Jurist.law.pitt.edu. 2008-08-04. Retrieved 2010-06-04.
    22. ^ Parameswaran, Prashanth (2008-08-18). “Preserving the Southern Philippines’ Threatened Peace Deal”. World Politics Review. Retrieved 2009-01-14.
    23. ^ a b c Arguillas, C. (2008), SC affirms Oct. 14 ruling on “unconstitutional” MOA-AD, Mindanews
    24. ^ a b Mindanews (2009), Young Moro group appeals to public: “open your hearts to the Moro grievance”, Mindanews
    25. ^ Mindanaws (2009), Military starts operations against Bravo, Mindanews
    26. ^ Gallardo, F. (2009), Thousands line up road for Mindanao Peace Power Day, Mindanews
    27. ^ supremecourt.gov.ph/news, SC Declares MOA-AD Unconstitutional
    28. ^ “abs-cbnnews, Palace loses ancestral domain case with 8-7 SC vote”. Abs-cbnnews.com. 2008-10-14. Retrieved 2010-06-04.
    29. ^ “Peace adviser committed ‘grave abuse of authority’”. Newsinfo.inquirer.net. 2008-10-14. Retrieved 2010-06-04.

     External links